Global Agenda by Luis Quesada

An opinion is just that and as such should be. Experience and expertise in something. Today I have to talk of Global Agenda, a game that I have followed closely, since before its first beta. I was lucky enough to try it in stages, I have read thousands of promises and patch notes promising a brutal experience, I have seen the famous video of the recon killing an elf, and all that I get excited.
First to say I like a phenomenal game, but with many, many limitations that today many games have already crossed. It’s a fun game, but with a short life, will become repetitive and monotonous as we focus on something. As a lover of MMOs I search for a true virtual world, that even while I sleep is still beating. On this basis shall speak of this game. I really think a “shooter” very entertaining and fun, but for what we provide, we have completed many more titles.
I say “shooter” because to me it’s nothing more really to give us a system of advance weapons, armor, etc, etc, I have degrees in as the new Call of Duty not called MMO, the same Battlefied Bad Company 2 from my point of view has a more complete feed system and it is still a “shooter”. As I said once, and I have discussed with some members of this community, the AVA system is not enough to call it MMO really this is as simple as PvP items and their results will paint the map in one color and another.
If we want to give it a more camouflage course Crafting system with which we can improve our character, but really if we are honest, any genre aficionado will notice vain and unimportant. What seems even stronger, is that few months ago a game as “CrimeCraft” became free due to their bad reviews, I do not understand because they have taken note and changed it. Global Agenda offers little more or less the same as the previous one, seems not to have read criticism of CrimeCraft. I want to be honest with you, but for me a screen just PvP and PvE are interconnected by a map of expected, actually have changed the starting screen for a shooter with a mini map by which you can jump and buy dye while you wait. I can understand the lure of virtual world and force me to pay a monthly fee to live there to go crazy over one but please do not make me pay for it.
Nor do I say that is not a product not worth it, but if it really hurts the monthly maintenance. What if I have attracted much attention is that many features that were enabled in the beta release are capadas. We can freely walk through the lobby while we see half the shops are closed. I really look impressive that we want to charge for something that a lot of games we offer, “vehicles? How many games today offer us this?, This is an example and a map that is supposed conquest, no longer reflecting battles is tiny on a map, there really is no interconnection between them, you can not cross walk, persistent world I doubt it.
This game will be and as I have tried, very funny, but many people like me, has noticed that the fun does not require a monthly payment. Your proposal and your idea is very promising, but obviously will have to develop much more, today, this lack of content. Another important point is the inequality of classes, only having four should have looked more, I can find with a robotic they even lost their stage win more than the opposing team’s best. As I see classes as normal retail price, which may focus on the branch of sniper skill and others should use to download a two-shot goal, many times with the first shot you know where you do not stop and get the second shot, which no skill is less potent than the first. After months of beta, thought this would be solved, but they have not, get on stage and seen as a DPS medic finishes first in front of a pure DPS seems unreal, do not say you should not hurt the doctor, but we all know that the DPS of a hybrid class should never reach a pure class.
These are small details that after a trial period in beta, are doing something to hurt in this great game. Finally one last thing, we end European and American servers, but at eight o’clock we meet with forty scenarios course in America and only fifteen in Europe is telling us something, where is the people? It is more a question I would pass them, and saves more than the mode of pay per play is normal, and be micro-payments or monthly payments, ” we are willing to pay for everything?
  1. No comments yet.
(will not be published)
Subscribe to comments feed
  1. No trackbacks yet.

SetPageWidth